[theme-reviewers] [theme-rviewer]

[Amy Hendrix]

Sure. That would count as "you have the rights to use", in my book.
Themeforest themes, from what I've seen, aren't licensed that way.

On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
> And there is where it gets tricky: if the original Theme is licensed as 100%
> GPL-compatible, then a derivative Theme *could* be considered for inclusion
> in the repository - provided that it properly attributes original
> copyright/license, and represents a "significant difference" in design
> and/or functionality.
>
> Chip
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Amy Hendrix <sabreuse at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> In that case, you're not talking about a child theme at all (which has
>> a specific technical meaning within WordPress). You're talking about a
>> copy of somebody else's design, which would not be allowed unless you
>> have the rights to use that design.
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 2:22 PM, Elan Technosys <elantechnosys at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Actually that is original but not 100% I have created same look and user
>> > will not need to buy the parent theme.
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>