[theme-reviewers] Question

[Chip Bennett]

My issue with the sub-menu page is the precedent that it sets, and the
question of whether it belongs as a sub-page. The Appearance sub-menu is
supposed to hold pages related to altering the *current* Theme's
appearance. A "More Themes" page confuses the UX in that "More Themes" have
nothing to do with modifying the current Theme, and also in that the
correct place to add "more Themes" is the Appearance -> Themes -> Add New
Theme page.

Chip

On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:42 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:

> Do you honestly think that this is the only Theme that does this? No,
> there's more :) Checking for abuse, well that's why we have the Diff for,
> whatever is changed it will appear there, if Theme is approved with
> potential abuse links, well that means that we're not doing our job
> correctly.
>
> Emil
>
> On Fri, Apr 6, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Merci Javier <mercijavier at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>>
>> I am concerned about this issue. This new "More Themes" panel has a huge
>> potential for abuse.
>>
>> Also, with the approval of a theme which has this function in the
>> official WP Theme Repository, I would bet that almost every theme author
>> will add a new "More Themes" page in Appearance -- which would be another
>> check by a theme reviewer to see that links within "more themes" are kosher.
>>
>> Mercime
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20120406/0b3f86fa/attachment.htm>