[theme-reviewers] Submitting a One-Page Placeholder Theme

[Edward Caissie]

I like the theme-slug white-list, versus the author white-list, in
conjunction with a tag/keyword.
Also, the reviewer(s) will need to be able to easily see the theme would
require special attention after the first approved version goes live.

I take it this would be a completely manual process into the repo, or would
we be going with a proper submission after the theme passes the
niche/non-niche criteria and the white-list(s) have been updated?


Cais.


On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 3:03 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> wrote:
> > So, same thing, except for white-listed *usernames*, rather than
> > *theme-slugs*?
> > My issue with that idea is that, then, even that user's *non-niche*
> Themes
> > would bypass the checks (and most likely, the Reviewer will have no idea
> of
> > this occurrence - unless the Trac ticket includes some relevant
> > notification). Thus, if we're going to go to the trouble of
> white-listing, I
> > think theme-slug makes more sense than username.
> > And speaking of Trac handling: I like the idea of appending a relevant
> > *ticket keyword* for such Themes, so that we can process them separately.
>
> Theme slug would work too.
>
> Tags or keywords could be added too.
>
> -Otto
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111028/7405957f/attachment.htm>