[theme-reviewers] jquery 1.6.1

Dion Hulse (dd32) wordpress at dd32.id.au
Wed Oct 12 06:40:17 UTC 2011


The only difference should be that WordPress uses the noConflict() mode of
jQuery.
As a result, you can't use $() directly, instead, you need to use jQuery()
or a wrapping function to create the $() object.
See
http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/wp_enqueue_script#jQuery_noConflict_wrappersfor
info on that..

On 12 October 2011 17:17, Tom Matteson <perspectivevision at gmail.com> wrote:

> Greetings ...
>
> I was updating my theme after posting a question on this list a few days
> ago. Part of my edits relate to enqueuing and registering scripts. In the
> process, I was also reading on the WPTRT site about the majority consensus
> regarding using the WP bundled versions of jQuery rather than a CDN version.
> My theme was already setup to use a 1.6.1 CDN version. I know that with WP
> 3.2.1 that jQuery 1.6.1 is bundled; which, is great. However, I discovered
> the file wp-includes/js/jquery/jquery.js is not the same as
> http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.6.1/jquery.min.js. They have
> the same time-stamp & comments. However, there are not identical. I
> discovered they are not the same jquery file because, when using the bundled
> version, some mouseover or hover behaviors do not work my theme. However,
> they work as they are supposed to with the Google API version. If I copy the
> Google version into the bundled jquery.js file and save it, everything works
> fine.  On the face they appear to be the same file. However, they are not.
> This leads me to two questions. First, is that by design; are they supposed
> to be different? Second, if they are supposed to be the same, should I be
> submitting this as a bug?
>
> *Best Regards
> Tom Matteson*
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111012/73ac2f2f/attachment.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list