[theme-reviewers] Help on theme review - Did I waste my time?

[Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)]

Why should they be treated any differently? it's just post types and post types already pass the process.   Are you going to stop themes that have the new post elements? those handle content creation as well.  It's just another level, that is all.

Is it because the theme team doesn't know how to test them?  Does it do anything to circumvent security?  What "is" is specifically that would warrant them to be treated any differently?  They're theme's with special functionality built into the theme that utilize CORE code to do as such which was written specifically for those purposes, whether in a theme or a plugin.

- Phil


  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Simon Prosser 
  To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org 
  Sent: Sunday, May 29, 2011 4:25 PM
  Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Help on theme review - Did I waste my time?


  Patches are always welcome ;)


  On 30 May 2011 00:13, Ryan Frankel <ryan.frankel at gmail.com> wrote:

    I think a lot of us that are developing some 'specialized' themes would be more then happy to devote some time and energy to helping get this right. I think both sides have valid points and the concern seems to mostly stem from placing the themes in the regular repo. We all agree that new specialized themes are only a good thing for WP and are a reason that 3.1+ is so powerful.

    I think it would be relatively easy to modify the theme-check plugin to support specialized themes.  There are only a few 'required' elements would have to be removed or modified.

    Anyways, if the theme team does decide or start a discussion of the requirements I think a lot of us would gladly help out to set up the infrastructure to support it.

    -Ryan

    Sent from my iPad


    On May 29, 2011, at 6:11 PM, "Jonny Cauvain" <furcifer at furcifer.me> wrote:

    > That's understandable.
    >
    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
    > [mailto:theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] On Behalf Of Otto
    > Sent: 29 May 2011 23:06
    > To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
    > Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Help on theme review - Did I waste my time?
    >
    > On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 4:55 PM, Jonny Cauvain <furcifer at furcifer.me> wrote:
    >> Can't you just add a separate category called " specialized" Themes,
    >> we can move ahead with possibly creating a spate review process with
    >> different guidelines?
    >
    > That's what I was thinking, but when mucking with anything on .org that also
    > integrates with the WP core, like the theme directory, then we'd prefer to
    > get it right the first time. So give it some time for input to be gathered.
    >
    > -Otto
    > _______________________________________________
    > theme-reviewers mailing list
    > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
    > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
    >
    > _______________________________________________
    > theme-reviewers mailing list
    > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
    > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
    _______________________________________________
    theme-reviewers mailing list
    theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
    http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers




  -- 
  My Blog: http://www.pross.org.uk/
  Plugins : http://www.pross.org.uk/plugins/
  Themes: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/pross



------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  theme-reviewers mailing list
  theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
  http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110529/bd4f104b/attachment.htm>