[theme-reviewers] Trac not synching with Extend?
Chip Bennett
chip at chipbennett.net
Thu May 26 22:07:59 UTC 2011
Well, I just updated the Trac reports to accommodate the "Priority" fileld
in addition to the "syncapproved"/"syncold" keywords.
I found using the reports to be more efficient, but others' mileage may
vary. In any case, it's a good agenda topic for our upcoming meeting. :)
Chip
On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:54 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:
> My primary concern is keeping Trac and Extend in sync; the method/workflow
> to accomplish that is only a tool to do a job with.
>
> ... many years of scanning and scrolling at my "day job" has dulled the
> edges of that "incessant" practice.
>
> I really don't find it bothersome at all (anymore), it is simply a task to
> be completed.
>
>
> Cais.
>
>
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 5:14 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>> > Though, if Otto can implement something using the "Priority" (or other)
>> > field, it would probably be even easier.
>>
>> I added "normal" and "needs-sync" as the priorities a while back.
>> Reviewers should have the ability to change that field from the
>> dropdown.
>>
>> -Otto
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110526/063813f9/attachment.htm>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list