[theme-reviewers] Trac not synching with Extend?

[Edward Caissie]

Dang ... I forgot about that. Using the method of adding an action or
process to indicate the Theme *needs* to be sync'd also dictates an
additional action is required to say the Theme *has been* sync'd.

Given the above, I do not agree with the benefits of this method, now.


Cais.

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 5:21 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> I would think that the report simply needs to look for the modifier. When
> the Theme is synched, the modifier is changed, so that the ticket no longer
> shows up in the list.
>
> Chip
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 4:08 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> That may work, perhaps in conjunction with a report of Themes modified in
>> the last (arbitrary number) 7 days?
>>
>>
>> Cais
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>
>>> That would work, too.
>>>
>>> Chip
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > REVIEWERS: when you close a ticket as APPROVED, add the following
>>>> keyword to
>>>> > the ticket: "syncapproved". That way, we can add a Trac report around
>>>> this
>>>> > keyword, and won't have to search for approved Themes that need to be
>>>> > synced. This way, whomever does the sync can just remove the keyword
>>>> from
>>>> > the ticket.
>>>> >
>>>> > (If you want to be extra helpful, for tickets closed as not-approved
>>>> or
>>>> > newer-version-uploaded, add this keyword to the ticket: "synchold".
>>>> But
>>>> > getting the *approved* Themes synced as quickly as possible is far
>>>> more
>>>> > important than syncing *old* (i.e. not-approved or
>>>> newer-version-uploaded)
>>>> > tickets.)
>>>> >
>>>> > After having helped with the Trac-Extend sync for a few weeks now, I'm
>>>> > fairly convinced that this method would be more efficient than the
>>>> current
>>>> > workflow.
>>>>
>>>> I think there's probably a better way than using keywords for this.
>>>> It's kind of a loose field, not suitable for everything.
>>>>
>>>> While we're not using them on theme's trac at the moment, there are
>>>> other fields we can use for this. Priority and severity and component
>>>> spring to mind. These are just dropdowns with items we can put in
>>>> them.
>>>>
>>>> What if I changed the Priority field to have "normal" and "needs-sync"
>>>> as options? Then reviewers could mark the ticket as in need of syncing
>>>> when they approve it and such.
>>>>
>>>> -Otto
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110523/0ddce40e/attachment-0001.htm>