[theme-reviewers] Trac not synching with Extend?

Edward Caissie edward.caissie at gmail.com
Mon May 23 21:08:04 UTC 2011


That may work, perhaps in conjunction with a report of Themes modified in
the last (arbitrary number) 7 days?


Cais

On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> That would work, too.
>
> Chip
>
>
> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 12:28 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> wrote:
>> > REVIEWERS: when you close a ticket as APPROVED, add the following
>> keyword to
>> > the ticket: "syncapproved". That way, we can add a Trac report around
>> this
>> > keyword, and won't have to search for approved Themes that need to be
>> > synced. This way, whomever does the sync can just remove the keyword
>> from
>> > the ticket.
>> >
>> > (If you want to be extra helpful, for tickets closed as not-approved or
>> > newer-version-uploaded, add this keyword to the ticket: "synchold". But
>> > getting the *approved* Themes synced as quickly as possible is far more
>> > important than syncing *old* (i.e. not-approved or
>> newer-version-uploaded)
>> > tickets.)
>> >
>> > After having helped with the Trac-Extend sync for a few weeks now, I'm
>> > fairly convinced that this method would be more efficient than the
>> current
>> > workflow.
>>
>> I think there's probably a better way than using keywords for this.
>> It's kind of a loose field, not suitable for everything.
>>
>> While we're not using them on theme's trac at the moment, there are
>> other fields we can use for this. Priority and severity and component
>> spring to mind. These are just dropdowns with items we can put in
>> them.
>>
>> What if I changed the Priority field to have "normal" and "needs-sync"
>> as options? Then reviewers could mark the ticket as in need of syncing
>> when they approve it and such.
>>
>> -Otto
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110523/e0375831/attachment.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list