[theme-reviewers] MS Expressions in CSS

Emil Uzelac emil at themeid.com
Thu May 12 02:37:24 UTC 2011


I agree with the Chip and not to continue this any longer just want to say
one last thing. IE6 is not officially banned and IMHO it should be, Google,
Facebook, YouTube and many others phased out the IE6 support last year, when
you combine all three sites together the number of visitors is enormous. If
they can do it, so can we. Since 2008 I work exclusively with Auto Insurance
sites (WordPress of course), few of them have over 1M monthly visitors and
none support IE6.

In last few years there was only few times when someone would actually
complain about IE6 and to be honest with you not a single site owner had any
interest in dealing with this at all. Site do have
http://code.google.com/p/friendly-ie6-upgrade-notice/ to inform them that
it's time for an upgrade.

Cheers,
Emil

*----*
*Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein



On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 8:30 PM, Sayontan Sinha <sayontan at gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks, Chip!
>
>
> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> I believe the current quasi-official stance of the WordPress project,
>> regarding IE6 support, is that for *core*/*backend*, it is no longer
>> officially supported as of WordPress 3.2, but that it *should* still be
>> supported on the *front end*.
>>
>> My opinion is that, until we get direction from the powers-that-be that we
>> should formally cease support for IE6, that such support is acceptable (not
>> as *required* or even *recommended*, but rather as *optional*) for
>> repository-hosted Themes.
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Sayontan Sinha <sayontan at gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>> What are the general guidelines for usage of MS Expressions in CSS in
>>> themes (for compatibility with IE6)? This is an accepted method in the
>>> industry, but W3C's CSS validator reports these as syntax errors. Would
>>> themes be rejected for these?
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Sayontan.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Sayontan Sinha
>>> http://mynethome.net | http://mynethome.net/blog
>>>  --
>>> Beating Australia in Cricket is like killing a celebrity. The death gets
>>> more coverage than the crime.
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Sayontan Sinha
> http://mynethome.net | http://mynethome.net/blog
> --
> Beating Australia in Cricket is like killing a celebrity. The death gets
> more coverage than the crime.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110511/769f8bc4/attachment.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list