[theme-reviewers] Including Creative Commons Attribution Code

[Edward Caissie]

@Emil -

I think what you did may have been what should have been done in the first
place. It was quite nice of the CC (aka "Nathan" replying for them) to reply
so quickly; and, clear this up so easily.


Cais.

On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 7:04 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:

> Otto and the rest, hopefully you guys didn't mind that I went that far.
> The entire discussion starting from the beginning of Sayontan's question
> was/is here to help us better understand, that's all.
>
> I'm Getting back to work,
> Emil
>
> *Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
> emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
> Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>
>> >> From: Nathan Kinkade <nkinkade at creativecommons.org>
>> >> Date: Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 5:50 PM
>> >> Subject: Re: GPL
>> >> To: Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com>
>> >> Cc: info at creativecommons.org
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Hi Emil,
>> >>
>> >> My understanding is that no CC license is compatible with any GPL
>> >> license.  Doing a web search for something like "cc gpl compatible"
>> >> should turn up some resources for you.
>> >>
>> >> Best,
>> >>
>> >> Nathan
>>
>> Good enough for me.
>>
>> -Otto
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110313/c4ce0788/attachment.htm>