[theme-reviewers] Second Opinion

Emil Uzelac emil at themeid.com
Wed Jan 19 10:52:42 UTC 2011


This would be no go, the guy is building links via theme and that's not
cool. Please see Google cache on this http://is.gd/TSWfvV


*Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter:
@EmilUzelac<http://twitter.com/emiluzelac>| E:
emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
*Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.* - Albert Einstein



On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:13 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <
philip at frumph.net> wrote:

>  heh well thats not far from what it looks like in firefox too, that text
> on the image looks horrible
>
>
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>   *Sent:* Tuesday, January 18, 2011 8:55 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Second Opinion
>
> Follow up:
>
> Firefox: renders fine
> Chrome: does not render properly
> IE8: does not render properly
>
> By "does not render properly", here's what I'm seeing<http://www.chipbennett.net/upload/paydaydesigns.png>
> .
>
> Chip
>
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <
> philip at frumph.net> wrote:
>
>>  i'm sorry, i'm confused as to why it's not rendering to you?
>>
>> think its a browser issue or connection to the site?
>>
>>
>>
>>  ----- Original Message -----
>> *From:* Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>   *Sent:* Tuesday, January 18, 2011 8:05 AM
>> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Second Opinion
>>
>> Can you and Phil post screencaps on the ticket? I'll reinstall the Theme
>> and do the same.
>>
>> (Or, if it's not the author's original work, maybe we just deny it on
>> those grounds?)
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Edward Caissie <
>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> IT rendered fine but like Phil pointed out, there are some obvious items
>>> to look at ...
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 11:00 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <
>>> philip at frumph.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  yes yes and yes, renders fine sorta..
>>>>
>>>> last post from from last october, the 404 page renders like crap
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The real template author for this is http://www.bloggerthemes.net/
>>>>
>>>> as shown here
>>>>
>>>> http://www.dhetemplate.com/2010/11/free-all-green-blogger-template.html
>>>> #
>>>>
>>>> (notice the paydaydesigns.info on that page)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>   ----- Original Message -----
>>>> *From:* Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>>> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, January 18, 2011 7:47 AM
>>>> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Second Opinion
>>>>
>>>> Can you read any of the content?
>>>>
>>>> Does it look like screenshot.png?
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Edward Caissie <
>>>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> IT seems to load fine for me ... haven't tested it or anything. What
>>>>> issues are you having?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Jay <furcifer at furcifer.me> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey chip.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Just taking a quick look from my phone, it's the same theme that's on
>>>>>> the author url, and i'm having issues with that.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> >Hey All,
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >I could not get this Theme
>>>>>> ><https://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2655>to render properly
>>>>>> for
>>>>>> >me. Can someone else confirm that it is the Theme,
>>>>>> >and not something with my test environment?
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Thanks!
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >Chip
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >_______________________________________________
>>>>>> >theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> >theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> >http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>  ------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>  ------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110119/83d43a66/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list