[theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes] #2427: THEME: LightWord - 2.0.0.6

[Emil Uzelac]

Yes, I was under the same impression as Otto that's why I didn't mention
while reviewing the theme. Now is see that this was not GPL compatible.
Trainee is (^-^")'\


*Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter:
@EmilUzelac<http://twitter.com/emiluzelac>| E:
emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
*Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler.* - Albert Einstein



On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> No, it's not:
>
>  *The Font Software may be sold as part of a larger software package but no
> copy of one or more of the Font Software typefaces may be sold by itself.
> *
>
>
> That's not a GPL-compatible restriction.
>
> Chip
>
> On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 4:58 PM, WordPress Themes <
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org> wrote:
>
>> #2427: THEME: LightWord - 2.0.0.6
>> -------------------------+-----------------------------
>>  Reporter:  andreiluca  |     Owner:  Fingli
>>      Type:  theme       |    Status:  closed
>> Resolution:  approved    |  Keywords:  theme-lightword,
>> -------------------------+-----------------------------
>>
>> Comment (by Otto42):
>>
>>  Actually, Vera is one of the free fonts, and I believe it is GPL
>>  compatible: http://www.gnome.org/fonts/#Final_Bitstream_Vera_Fonts
>>
>>  I may be wrong.
>>
>> --
>> Ticket URL: <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2427#comment:5>
>>  WordPress Themes <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/>
>> WordPress.org Theme Directory Reviews
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110113/89d86d4e/attachment-0001.htm>