[theme-reviewers] Why the bias?

Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) philip at frumph.net
Tue Feb 15 05:16:14 UTC 2011

Let me clarify, its usage is apparently inside the editor which makes no 
difference to how it is viewed in output to the end user.  Which makes the 
whole functionality of it not useful.

The post display to the end user will always be different then inside the 
editor since the editor sure *(i guess)* will change the image width and if 
you use add_editor_style will only match a close proximation of the output 
to the end user.

Since it doesn't effect the output to the end user itself there's no real 
necessity to call it having any bearance to its usage.

However, the output is effected with the video embedding.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Otto" <otto at ottodestruct.com>
To: <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 8:57 PM
Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Why the bias?

On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)
<philip at frumph.net> wrote:
>> The $content_width only apples to
>> 'large' sized images.
> It has no control over images, only the external media library functions
> like the youtube videos that when the setting is checked to parse
> the_content to load the video by url.

You will find that you are mistaken. I refer you to
wp-includes/media.php, in the function named
image_constrain_size_for_editor(). Specifically, examine the case
where $size == 'large'.

theme-reviewers mailing list
theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list