[theme-reviewers] Getting The Review Queue Back On Track

Justin Tadlock justin at justintadlock.com
Fri Dec 16 03:23:51 UTC 2011

I'll be back in the game a bit too now that I'm no longer working for 
DevPress.  I've got a little extra time.  In fact, I'll start back tonight.

On 12/14/2011 7:52 PM, Chip Bennett wrote:
> All,
> Please read; comments welcome!
> http://make.wordpress.org/themes/2011/12/15/getting-the-review-queue-back-on-track/
> The TL;DR list of changes:
>         * Anyone who requests a ticket to review, and then completes
>           their assigned review, will be given full “reviewer” status
>           in Theme-Trac
>         * We’re adding a fourth tier to the prioritization, which will
>           become the new #2 priority: tickets that have been in the
>           review queue for longer than two weeks, regardless of
>           previous review/approval status
>         * Any review-based Theme revision that is submitted within two
>           days of the previous review will be assigned to the
>           previous-ticket reviewer, and the review continued on the
>           new ticket
>         * W3C Validation criticality is being reduced from REQUIRED to
>           RECOMMENDED, and Theme reviewers will no longer make review
>           comments regarding W3C Validation
>         * The Theme Review Team will no longer emphasize complete and
>           thorough reviews, and will instead close tickets upon
>           observation of any non-trivial issues
> As always, this is an evolving experiment; we're still/always trying 
> to improve. Thank you, all, for your continued contributions as Theme 
> developers and reviewers!
> Chip
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20111215/b96229df/attachment.htm>

More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list