[theme-reviewers] Author URI

[Edward Caissie]

"Stick (to front)" is the recommended option, although I do not believe
there is any real difference considering we are only dealing with the first
15 Themes and we have been keeping the count to (a maximum of) 12 Featured
at a time.


Cais.

On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> Okay, that's done (and it was easy).
>
> For future reference: to "feature" Themes, are they made "sticky", or
> "super-sticky" (i.e. "to front")?
>
> Chip
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I agree, 48 hours should be more than sufficient to correct this issue;
>> and, I was going to suggest you go in and "un-stick" the EvoLve theme for
>> the practice as well (*grin*).
>>
>>
>> Cais.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:35 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>
>>> I added a comment to the ticket, indicating that AuthorURI needs to be
>>> addressed in both EvoLve and SmartOne.
>>>
>>> Depending on how he responds, I suggest requiring a fix within 48 hours.
>>>
>>> And certainly, EvoLve should be UN-featured. Unless anyone has any
>>> objections, I'll go in and do it (it will give me a chance to figure out how
>>> it's done).
>>>
>>> Chip
>>>
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:31 AM, Edward Caissie <
>>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> It would seem the Evolve theme should be removed from the Featured
>>>> Themes page as well then ... the Author URI should have been addressed
>>>> before it was approved (and added as a Featured theme) but now definitely
>>>> needs to be addressed no later than the next revision, which preferably will
>>>> be in the very near future.
>>>>
>>>> @Curtis - What points did the author use to support their argument for
>>>> the Author URI being valid?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cais.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> He uses the same thing for EvoLve, which is currently a FEATURED Theme.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chip
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:17 AM, Edward Caissie <
>>>>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Not even close in my books.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (at a glance) The landing page does not reference any sort of
>>>>>> development or design related information. No references to WordPress. The
>>>>>> Author URI is simply just generating a link to an unrelated site as I see
>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cais.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 9:55 AM, Curtis McHale <
>>>>>> curtis at curtismchale.ca> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Author URI: http://blogatize.net
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110425/f06044a7/attachment.htm>