[theme-reviewers] Using wp_enqueue_style() With IE Conditionals

[Chip Bennett]

Why not just enqueue your own "plugins" stylesheet, at wp_head, with a
priority of 9999?

Chip

On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:59 PM, Curtis McHale <curtis at curtismchale.ca>wrote:

> Funny on personal projects I put my stylesheet after wp_head so I can
> override the enqueued stylesheets for plugins that don't let you turn them
> off or are way over qualified and make it hard to write CSS rules that kill
> them. I know it's not best practice but it's way easier than fighting plugin
> CSS all day.
>
> Curtis McHale
> PH: 604.751.3482
> http://www.curtismchale.ca
> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
> Twitter: twitter.com/curtismchale
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> I consider that to be by design, that the primary stylesheet, i.e.
>> style.css, is hard-coded into the document head. That way, it's easier to
>> override with enqueued stylesheets.
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>>
>>> If you're going to require wp_enqueue_style for CSS files, then you
>>> might want to provide some good examples of how to do that for things
>>> like the normal style.css file and such, since the vast majority of
>>> themes do not use the enqueue for normal styling.
>>>
>>> -Otto
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 4:11 PM, Justin Tadlock
>>> <justin at justintadlock.com> wrote:
>>> > That's fine by me.
>>> >
>>> > I thought we already had wp_enqueue_style() and wp_enqueue_script() in
>>> the
>>> > guidelines.  Now, I see that it was just a reference to the comment
>>> reply
>>> > script.
>>> >
>>> > On 4/21/2011 1:50 PM, Edward Caissie wrote:
>>> >
>>> > I agree with "recommended" for adding additional stylesheets via
>>> > wp_enqueue_style() immediately and pushing it to required with 3.2;
>>> which
>>> > seems will not be all that far off.
>>> >
>>> > I would also think that example, or similar ones, should be linked to
>>> so
>>> > authors have something to work from if/when they adapt this "new"
>>> method.
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Cais.
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Apr 21, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> I agree - but we rarely take something from a non-suggestion to
>>> *required*
>>> >> in one step, unless a critical need exists.
>>> >> The general path is to make something *recommended*, fit-test it for a
>>> >> while, and then bump it up to *required*.
>>> >> Chip
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 1:27 PM, Justin Tadlock <
>>> justin at justintadlock.com>
>>> >> wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This should be the *required* way.  Additional stylesheets should
>>> always
>>> >>> be added with wp_enqueue_style().  This is what I've been putting in
>>> my
>>> >>> reviews, even for conditional stylesheets.
>>> >>>
>>> >>> On 4/21/2011 1:22 PM, Chip Bennett wrote:
>>> >>>
>>> >>> I just found this:
>>> >>>
>>> >>>
>>> http://iamzed.com/2010/01/07/using-wordpress-wp_enqueue_style-with-conditionals/
>>> >>>
>>> >>> wp_enqueue_style(
>>> >>>    'ie7-style',
>>> >>>    get_template_directory_uri() . '/ie7.css'
>>> >>> );
>>> >>> global $wp_styles;
>>> >>> $wp_styles->add_data( 'ie7-style', 'conditional', 'lte IE 7′);
>>> >>>
>>> >>> This might move into the Guidelines, as *Recommended* implementation
>>> of
>>> >>> enqueueing IE-conditional stylesheets. Thoughts?
>>> >>> Chip
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >>>
>>> >>> _______________________________________________
>>> >>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> >>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> >>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >>>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>> >> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> >> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> >> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________
>>> > theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>> >
>>> >
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110421/030a19bc/attachment.htm>