[theme-reviewers] Theme Request
chip at chipbennett.net
Tue Apr 19 03:07:42 UTC 2011
I would note #1 as something to be fixed in the next revision. Use of
"license.txt" explicitly is for (hopefully) some future
integration/automation with Extend, and to try to create a de facto naming
convention - but the primary intent is that the full-text license is
declared. So, I wouldn't fail a review due to the naming inconsistency.
For #2: note it in the review, but this also isn't (alone) cause to fail a
On Mon, Apr 18, 2011 at 10:01 PM, rex posadas <rexposadas at yahoo.com> wrote:
> To All.
> Questions about the theme I am reviewing:
> 1) Is this a strict rule? The theme I am reviewing has "GPL.txt" instead
> of "license.txt". Is it a cause for disapproval?
> Themes are *required* to declare their license explicitly, using one of
> the following methods:
> - Adding *License* and *License URI* header slugs to style.css
> - Including a *license.txt* file with the Theme
> 2) A css line does not fare well with the validators, but does not harm
> the layout. is it a cause for disapproval? The css line is:
> border-radius: none;
> validators note "none" as an invalid value for that property.
> *From:* Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Sent:* Sat, April 16, 2011 4:42:46 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Theme Request
> @rxn: Give this one a try http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3367
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at 1:24 PM, rex posadas <rexposadas at yahoo.com> wrote:
>> I just completed the steps to join the WP theme reviewers team, and
>> request to
>> be assigned a theme for the review. My wordpress.org username is: rxn
>> Thanks and have a good day.
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the theme-reviewers