[theme-reviewers] Join the team

[Emil Uzelac]

menu is OK, widgetized menu is OK too ;)
*----*
*Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert Einstein



On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> I actually disagree regarding the "Menu" Widget - maybe. :)
>
> If the Theme simply provides a Widgetized sidebar, and no "Navigation Menu"
> markup, then this approach is fine. However, if the Theme has what would
> reasonably considered to be the design intent of a Navigation Menu, then
> that implementation must support the core Nav Menu feature.
>
> Basically: Themes are not *required* to provide Navigation Menus, but if
> they *do* provide a Navigation Menu, then it must support the core
> functionality.
>
> Chip
>
>
> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:13 PM, Emil Uzelac <emil at themeid.com> wrote:
>
>> 1. The theme uses the text domain of Twenty Ten in a few spots. If I
>> remember correctly from lurking on the list this is a reason for failure of
>> the theme.
>> *Yes, Twenty Ten should be changed to i.e. silverville*
>> **
>> 2. They use a widget for the menu and instruct the user to add the Pages
>> widget. It seems to me that it's a much better option to use a WordPress
>> menu which defaults to list pages. I don't believe this is an issue for a
>> fail but probably a good suggestion as an update to the user.
>> *This part is just fine. As long as there are options for menu and being
>> fully functional.*
>> **
>> 3. The CSS fails on the background-color since it's value is set to 'none'
>> when it should be set to 'transparent'. Would this typically be a reason for
>> failure if all other CSS is okay?
>> *background-color: none; is invalid and it should be transparent.
>> Recommendation would be background: none; or background-image: none; and not
>> many people use the last one anymore. It's shortcoded via background.*
>>  **
>> 4. There are a number of other 'recommended' items in Theme Check but
>> these are not a reason to fail a theme correct?
>> *Recommended isn't required, if recommendations don't cause  problems, no
>> need to fail.
>> *
>> Emil
>> **
>> *----*
>> *Emil Uzelac* | ThemeID | T: 224-444-0006 | Twitter: @EmilUzelac | E:
>> emil at themeid.com | http://themeid.com
>>  Make everything as simple as possible, but not simpler. - Albert
>> Einstein
>>
>>
>>
>> On Sun, Apr 17, 2011 at 7:01 PM, Curtis McHale <curtis at curtismchale.ca>wrote:
>>
>>> I have a few questions about my first theme review.
>>>
>>> 1. The theme uses the text domain of Twenty Ten in a few spots. If I
>>> remember correctly from lurking on the list this is a reason for failure of
>>> the theme.
>>> 2. They use a widget for the menu and instruct the user to add the Pages
>>> widget. It seems to me that it's a much better option to use a WordPress
>>> menu which defaults to list pages. I don't believe this is an issue for a
>>> fail but probably a good suggestion as an update to the user.
>>> 3. The CSS fails on the background-color since it's value is set to
>>> 'none' when it should be set to 'transparent'. Would this typically be a
>>> reason for failure if all other CSS is okay?
>>> 4. There are a number of other 'recommended' items in Theme Check but
>>> these are not a reason to fail a theme correct?
>>>
>>> I could probably go further in to the theme but I wanted to double check
>>> on the text domain item before I did.
>>>
>>> Curtis McHale
>>> PH: 604.751.3482
>>> http://www.curtismchale.ca
>>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>>> Twitter: twitter.com/curtismchale
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Edward Caissie <
>>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here ya go: http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/3320
>>>> This will get you started ...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cais.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Apr 16, 2011 at 7:15 PM, Curtis McHale <curtis at curtismchale.ca>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Figured I'd finally get off my butt and join the team after looking at
>>>>> the list for a few months. My trac name is curtismchale
>>>>>
>>>>> Curtis McHale
>>>>> PH: 604.751.3482
>>>>> http://www.curtismchale.ca
>>>>> Linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/in/curtismchale
>>>>> Twitter: twitter.com/curtismchale
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20110417/2bfcde18/attachment.htm>