[theme-reviewers] Theme Uploader and CSS Classes

[Edward Caissie]

Yes, it has been very handy this morning getting through several themes that
just simply hit too many snags.

The results went into the tickets with a note to address them; read the
Theme Review pages; and, re-submit after addressing the issues.


Cais.

PS: I might just do a quick run through of the oldest 10 or so themes to see
if they can be pushed based on the Theme Checker findings. EAC

On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net
> wrote:

>  Think the more important thing that Pross's checker does is that it
> outputs information on 'how to' and everything that it found instead of just
> stopping at the first one.
>
> - pHil
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Sent:* Saturday, September 25, 2010 8:54 AM
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Theme Uploader and CSS Classes
>
> Pross' Theme Check does include a few items I would definitely like to see
> in the upload check, such as, body_class(), post_class(),
> comment_form()/comment_class(), etc.
>
> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 11:05 AM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <
> philip at frumph.net> wrote:
>
>> You should just incorporate Pross's instead, it's pretty damn good.  Even
>> includes references to the codex.
>>
>> - Phil
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Otto" <otto at ottodestruct.com>
>> To: <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
>> Sent: Saturday, September 25, 2010 7:58 AM
>>
>> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Theme Uploader and CSS Classes
>>
>>
>>   On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 2:14 AM, Andrew Nacin <wp at andrewnacin.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Sep 25, 2010 at 1:44 AM, Demetris Kikizas <kikizas at gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 11:43 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
>>>>> > - Must not include bloginfo('description') calls
>>>>>
>>>>> Why is that?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Otto reversed it. The theme must utilize the tagline.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Whoops! Yeah, got that backwards.
>>>
>>> Looking closer at the uploader, I think it could be made a lot
>>> smarter. It's a fair amount of work though, a lot of the existing
>>> uploader checks are very ad-hoc. Needs more of a framework behind it.
>>> I'll try and come up with something.
>>>
>>> Nacin, if you have any ideas along these lines, email me.
>>>
>>> -Otto
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100925/c365e93d/attachment-0001.htm>