[theme-reviewers] Discussion
Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)
philip at frumph.net
Wed Sep 1 16:10:43 UTC 2010
Just to point out a few things.
1) Dicussions are made pertaining to the tickets in question for being
not-accepted. Some are responded to by the theme authors., and noted. In
any event, there is a NEW ticket made for the fixes that were made.
Leaving the old ticket open will just leave it open. There is no way for
that old ticket to associate with the new upload. If there is, then the
person responsible for making it as such has not done so.
2) Conversations between review and theme authors continue on as noted
whether the previous ticket was closed or not, but underlying thought here
is that it continues and it does, it might not for people who are abusive as
you have seen; but I will not make special considerations for individuals
who write in that manner in my work, nor in my volunteering.
Everything is and has been looked at concerning how things are implemented
per the theme in question. Take for example the suffusion theme, he stated
clearly in his responses and well minus the whole
add_theme_support('menus'); thing it was handled and discussed and taken
care of.
It works, and it works well.
As always, experiences may vary and adding drama and weight to the
discussions "do it this way or else" will not make things happen, i'm
formally requesting that Otto be removed from any discussions for future
Theme Review interaction besides the event that he is the only one to be
looked at for adjusting the Trac.
In Otto's capacity of theme author, I request formally that Otto be cordial
and responsive to his arguments to invalidate the theme reviewers decision.
- Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list