[theme-reviewers] TimThumb

Edward Caissie edward.caissie at gmail.com
Tue Oct 12 20:06:21 UTC 2010


I'm DM'ing (one of) the timthumb developers ... let's see if I can get a
response before we get to far into this.


Cais.

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 4:04 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> Absolutely. Let's throw out the call for public comment, on a proposed
> Guideline revision to disallow TimThumb in favor of core Post Thumbnail
> functionality!
>
> It's entirely possible we're missing something. If not, then it will be
> good to know the *other* arguments, as well.
>
> Chip
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Perhaps the author(s)/developer(s) of timthumb should be asked what makes
>> it so special verus the_post_thumbnail?
>>
>> As you wrote, there may be something we are missing on why it should be
>> used ...
>>
>>
>> Cais.
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>
>>> Right - and the only thing that I can see that TimThumb does is expose
>>> image filtering.
>>>
>>> 1) I'm not familiar with any Themes using TimThumb solely for image
>>> filtering (though I concede that there must be some out there...)
>>>
>>> 2) The image filtering that TimThumb uses can be called directly from
>>> PHP <http://www.php.net/manual/en/function.imagefilter.php>.
>>>
>>> So, unless someone can point out something that I'm missing, it looks
>>> like there is no particular *need* for TimThumb.
>>>
>>> Chip
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Edward Caissie <
>>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> IF timthumb is being used solely in the fashion that
>>>> the_post_thumbnail() functionality can 100% manage then the_post_thumbnail()
>>>> should be used in its place ... I can support that on the condition it is
>>>> explained to the theme author how to do it.
>>>>
>>>> I am honestly not familiar enough with the workings of timthumb to know
>>>> exactly how to replace it with the_post_thumbnail().
>>>>
>>>> Now, on the other hand, if a theme is using timthumb for post thumbnails
>>>> due to a a unique application that the_post_thumbnail does not inherently
>>>> handle then the_post_thumbnail() remains an optional use item.
>>>>
>>>> As to the concern @Anca is raising, I would imagine since
>>>> the_post_thumbnail() is not using the 'fopen' function that it is addressing
>>>> that particular issue.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Cais.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:43 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I disagree, entirely.
>>>>>
>>>>> The wording of the Guidelines is that use of Post Thumbnail feature is
>>>>> not required, but that if Post Thumbnail feature is used, then
>>>>> implementation of the core functionality is required.
>>>>>
>>>>> In other words: you don't have to incorporate Post Thumbnails into your
>>>>> Theme - but if you do, you are REQUIRED to support the core functionality.
>>>>>
>>>>> Chip
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Edward Caissie <
>>>>> edward.caissie at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> When the timthumb issue arose at the end of August I put forward to
>>>>>> all the theme authors affected to consider using post_thumbnail() core
>>>>>> functionality as an alternative, but since post_thumbnail() usage is still
>>>>>> only recommended, theme authors are well within their designer's perogative
>>>>>> using timthumb, especially if they are making use of its unique functions.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cais.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> So, here's all I can really determine that TimThumb offers, that
>>>>>>> can't be accomplished through use of core Post Thumbnails functionality: image
>>>>>>> filters<http://www.binarymoon.co.uk/2010/08/timthumb-image-filters/>
>>>>>>> .
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I can see image filtering being useful for Theme designs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> But, should we be checking to ensure that Themes aren't just using
>>>>>>> TimThumb to make thumbnails (which should be done using the core Post
>>>>>>> Thumbnail functionality)?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Chip
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:19 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm completely unfamiliar with TimThumb. What is it, and what does
>>>>>>>> it do?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> It looks to me like it's just an image thumbnailer/resizer - which
>>>>>>>> is exactly what core Post Thumbnails does.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> So, should we even be allowing new Themes to be using TimThumb? Does
>>>>>>>> it do something that can't be accomplished with the core functionality?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Chip
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 2:00 PM, Gene Robinson <
>>>>>>>> emhr at submersible.me> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  I don't use tim-thumb but two themes I just reviewed were using
>>>>>>>>> it. I'll have to go back and look into them regarding this. The tickets
>>>>>>>>> were: Sriwijaya <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/1333>
>>>>>>>>>   and Syailendra <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/1428>. Also
>>>>>>>>> could someone look at my final comment on Syailendra<http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/query?keywords=%7Etheme-syailendra> as
>>>>>>>>> I am unsure if Chris is cc'd on this ticket by simply commenting.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You are welcome to assign me another theme if you like. When is
>>>>>>>>> training complete or is there a milestone to reach?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> -Gene(emhr)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Oct 12, 2010, at 2:25 PM, Edward Caissie wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> @Gene -
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Around the end of August several themes were noted to be using an
>>>>>>>>> older version of timthumb that had a potentiall security issue associated
>>>>>>>>> with the code as it was written. The timbthumb script itself was corrected
>>>>>>>>> before then but there were still older versions in use on some repository
>>>>>>>>> themes.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If you are using timthumb you can get the current version here if
>>>>>>>>> need be: http://code.google.com/p/timthumb/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101012/3715e721/attachment-0001.htm>


More information about the theme-reviewers mailing list