[theme-reviewers] Priority for themes supporting 3.0 features?

[Edward Caissie]

As much as the new features and additional functionality that WP3.0 offers,
I still believe it is the most fair consideration of the current themes in
the queue to review them in a first submitted first reviewed. This is in no
way meant to dissuade theme authors from adding these new options but IIRC,
the last I looked there may still be a few themes pre-3.0 release that
needed to be addressed. Should they be passed over? Personally, I think not.


Cais.


On Thu, Jul 1, 2010 at 4:28 PM, Tom Lany <mail at tomlany.net> wrote:

>  It looks like Magazine Basic 2.6.7 has already been approved.  If you
> submit a new version of the theme with this being the only change and Email
> the list, I will make sure this change gets put up right away.
>
> Feed Me, Seymour 1.2.2 has not been approved yet.  You can resubmit this.
>
>
> Tom Lany
> http://tomlany.net
>
>
> On 7/1/10 3:19 PM, Bavota San wrote:
>
> I wasn't aware that new allowable tags had been added for WordPress 3.0. I
> think many theme developers are just as uninformed. I have recently updated
> two of my themes to include the new menu system and the background editor
> but I did not include any tags to point that out. Magazine Basic 2.6.7 and
> Feed Me, Seymour 1.2.2 have these features. Should I re-submit them with the
> new tags?
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100701/7ddc62ed/attachment.htm>