[theme-reviewers] theme-reviewers Digest, Vol 7, Issue 49. Validation and errors in the test data
internet pers
internet.pers at gmail.com
Mon Dec 20 13:11:46 UTC 2010
Yet we are supposed to write valid xhtml, this means closing them tags! HTML
5 is very nice but not supported yet. So we use validation as a tool nothing
more to find those typo's and whatever. But the testdata should be good no
matter what, does it hurt to put in that slash and help thoose developpers
with one error less...
The same goes for the embedded, the test link is pointing to removed
material (copyrighted stuff) futher more embed is not in the standard, again
the work arround is easy.
It will help themebuilders in bughunting, when building for clients these
errors and not validating will bring lots of trouble. It's pretty difficult
to build a working theme. A clean test set that validates is the least we
can do, people are judged by it...
John
>
> ---------- Doorgestuurd bericht ----------
> From: internet pers <internet.pers at gmail.com>
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Date: Sun, 19 Dec 2010 02:17:21 +0100
> Subject: [theme-reviewers] Error in the test data?
> <img width="329" height="222" alt="test-image-landscape-900"
> class="alignnone size-full" src="
> http://wpthemetestdata.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/test-image-landscape-900.jpg
> ">
>
> The image tag must be closed!
>
> Found in a freshly downloaded import file, please check, it will fix
> validation errors. Also the embedded stuff has to be cleaned.
>
> <object type="application/x-shockwave-flash" data="myFlashMovie.swf"
> height="250" width="800"><param name="movie" value="myFlashMovie.swf"
> /></object>
>
> Perhaps this is a good option. I found this on
> http://wordpress.jdwebdev.com/blog/embed-xhtml-compliant-flash/.
>
> It will remove a ton of errors...
>
> John
>
>
>
> ---------- Doorgestuurd bericht ----------
> From: Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com>
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 19:28:28 -0600
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Error in the test data?
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 7:17 PM, internet pers <internet.pers at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > <img width="329" height="222" alt="test-image-landscape-900"
> > class="alignnone size-full"
> > src="
> http://wpthemetestdata.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/test-image-landscape-900.jpg
> ">
> >
> > The image tag must be closed!
>
> HTML 5 does not require that. Just an FYI, but XHTML is beating a dead
> horse at this point. I would not consider validation to be, well,
> valid anymore.
>
> -Otto
>
>
>
> ---------- Doorgestuurd bericht ----------
> From: "Philip M. Hofer \(Frumph\)" <philip at frumph.net>
> To: <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2010 17:36:02 -0800
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Error in the test data?
> Completely agree; not even worth an effort to care about validation, just
> the 'look' on how the end result is as it appears on the site.
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Otto" <otto at ottodestruct.com>
> To: <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> Sent: Saturday, December 18, 2010 5:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] Error in the test data?
>
>
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 7:17 PM, internet pers <internet.pers at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> <img width="329" height="222" alt="test-image-landscape-900"
>>> class="alignnone size-full"
>>> src="
>>> http://wpthemetestdata.files.wordpress.com/2008/09/test-image-landscape-900.jpg
>>> ">
>>>
>>> The image tag must be closed!
>>>
>>
>> HTML 5 does not require that. Just an FYI, but XHTML is beating a dead
>> horse at this point. I would not consider validation to be, well,
>> valid anymore.
>>
>> -Otto
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101220/ee8183c5/attachment.htm>
More information about the theme-reviewers
mailing list