[theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes]

Thu Dec 16 20:54:30 UTC 2010

Yes!

English default text strings, with translation files for any other language.

Chip

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:48 PM, Furcifer <furcifer at furcifer.net> wrote:

> Cheers Cais, just one question, themes hosted on WordPress. Do they gotta
> be English? lol
>
>
>
> *From:* theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org [mailto:
> theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] *On Behalf Of *Edward Caissie
> *Sent:* 16 December 2010 20:39
>
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes]
>
>
>
> OK, have a run at th is one: http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2111
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Furcifer <furcifer at furcifer.net> wrote:
>
> Comment submitted, got another? lol
>
>
>
> *From:* theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org [mailto:
> theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] *On Behalf Of *Edward Caissie
> *Sent:* 16 December 2010 20:25
>
>
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes]
>
>
>
> Thanks. It's built based on the client's mock-up, I just manipulated Twenty
> Ten to fit ... I'll be keeping a copy of the template files for future
> reference as the theme uses 'front-page.php' which is not found in the
> default Twenty Ten theme.
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Furcifer <furcifer at furcifer.net> wrote:
>
> [ there must be a significant difference in design and/or functionality
> for it to be considered a unique theme and not a child of the original
> parent.]
>
> Plagiarised: ~Grin~ Thanks guys.
>
>
>
> Damn Cais, that’s a nice looking theme
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org [mailto:
> theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] *On Behalf Of *Edward Caissie
> *Sent:* 16 December 2010 20:10
>
>
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes]
>
>
>
> Although Twenty Ten is getting most of the parent-child attention of late,
> essentially what Phil is saying is the case ...
>
> I generally use wording along the lines: there must be a significant
> difference in design and/or functionality for it to be considered a unique
> theme and not a child of the original parent.
>
> Here is an unreleased example of design difference, although the theme
> itself was commissioned, but due to budgetary constraints was not completed
> I would consider it different enough (visually, at least) in design to be
> considered as its own theme.
>
> http://mvbi.edwardcaissie.com/
>
> I'll be dismantling this test site soon ... but feel free to have a look.
>
>
> Cais.
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:55 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <
> philip at frumph.net> wrote:
>
> The old rule of thumb about the rips of twenty-ten used to be that just
> changing the text-domain was not enough, that it had to offer something
> different that twentyten did not, the header menubar/header piece at the top
> really doesn't cut it.
>
>
>
> As for the header image/text, they could respond that its 'by design' and
> really there's nothing you can say about it other then 'recommending' it be
> larger, but definately not a reason to fail the theme.
>
>
>
> So if the theme itself doesn't have anything new to add to its pretty much
> the twenty ten theme, thats sufficient enough to not-approve it,  respond
> back Cais if this is still the case?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
>
> *From:* Furcifer <furcifer at furcifer.net>
>
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>
> *Sent:* Thursday, December 16, 2010 11:49 AM
>
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes]
>
>
>
> I’m gonna suggest is be not approved until that header is fixed, it’s not
> really just the menu, the header image is set far too small as well, I’m
> guessing they didn’t use the standard  test data and that they were probably
> using a screen with a low res.
>
>
>
> *From:* theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org [mailto:
> theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] *On Behalf Of *Edward Caissie
> *Sent:* 16 December 2010 19:45
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes]
>
>
>
> Moving the menu in Twenty Ten can offer some challenges ...
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Furcifer <furcifer at furcifer.net> wrote:
>
> Yeah I was thinking that to
>
>
>
> *From:* theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org [mailto:
> theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] *On Behalf Of *Edward Caissie
> *Sent:* 16 December 2010 19:31
>
>
> *To:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes]
>
>
>
> Just a quick look (via SVN) at the header.php template file makes me think
> this is a Twenty-ten child-theme ...
>
>
> Cais.
>
> On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Furcifer <furcifer at furcifer.net> wrote:
>
> The new one that is, not the Typo theme >.<
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
> [mailto:theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] On Behalf Of Edward
> Caissie
> Sent: 16 December 2010 15:20
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes] #2131: THEME:
> Typo-o-graphy - 3.0.2
>
> No worries. That's why we work through the first ones together. Even
> long time reviewers still miss things, too.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 16, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Furcifer <furcifer at furcifer.net> wrote:
>
> > @Cais damn I missed a few things, I apologise.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: WordPress Themes <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 2:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: [WordPress Themes] #2131: THEME: Typo-o-graphy - 3.0.2
> >
> > #2131: THEME: Typo-o-graphy - 3.0.2
> > ---------------------+---------------------------------
> >  Reporter:  tommek  |     Owner:  FurciferRising
> >      Type:  theme   |    Status:  assigned
> > Resolution:          |  Keywords:  theme-typo-o-graphy,
> > ---------------------+---------------------------------
> >
> > Comment (by cais):
> >
> > => all (unique) theme functions should be appropriately prefixed with a
> > consistent 'namespace' such as 'typo_' to avoid possible conflicts; see
> > 'menu_args()' and 'add_my_stylesheet()' as examples (there are more to be
> > addressed).
> > -> index.html is does not need to be included with theme
> > -> The 'add_editor_style()' function was called but the default 'editor-
> > style.css' related file was not found. This should be addressed with the
> > next update.
> >
> > Overall: not-approved
> > * Items marked => must be addressed, they are singificant and will most
> > likely cause the theme to be not accepted.
> > * Items marked with -> are suggestions, but recommended to be addressed.
> > * Items marked with - are notes and observations.
> > * Other items noted should be addressed and corrected as needed.
> > * Additional review may be required once the above issues are resolved.
> >
> > --
> > Ticket URL: <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2131#comment:3>
> > WordPress Themes <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/>
> > WordPress.org Theme Directory Reviews
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101216/ba0bf6fb/attachment-0001.htm>