[theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes]

[Edward Caissie]

Just a quick look (via SVN) at the header.php template file makes me think
this is a Twenty-ten child-theme ...


Cais.

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:24 PM, Furcifer <furcifer at furcifer.net> wrote:

> The new one that is, not the Typo theme >.<
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org
> [mailto:theme-reviewers-bounces at lists.wordpress.org] On Behalf Of Edward
> Caissie
> Sent: 16 December 2010 15:20
> To: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> Subject: Re: [theme-reviewers] [WordPress Themes] #2131: THEME:
> Typo-o-graphy - 3.0.2
>
> No worries. That's why we work through the first ones together. Even
> long time reviewers still miss things, too.
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Dec 16, 2010, at 10:18 AM, Furcifer <furcifer at furcifer.net> wrote:
>
> > @Cais damn I missed a few things, I apologise.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: WordPress Themes <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
> > Sent: Thursday, December 16, 2010 2:49 PM
> > Subject: Re: [WordPress Themes] #2131: THEME: Typo-o-graphy - 3.0.2
> >
> > #2131: THEME: Typo-o-graphy - 3.0.2
> > ---------------------+---------------------------------
> >  Reporter:  tommek  |     Owner:  FurciferRising
> >      Type:  theme   |    Status:  assigned
> > Resolution:          |  Keywords:  theme-typo-o-graphy,
> > ---------------------+---------------------------------
> >
> > Comment (by cais):
> >
> > => all (unique) theme functions should be appropriately prefixed with a
> > consistent 'namespace' such as 'typo_' to avoid possible conflicts; see
> > 'menu_args()' and 'add_my_stylesheet()' as examples (there are more to be
> > addressed).
> > -> index.html is does not need to be included with theme
> > -> The 'add_editor_style()' function was called but the default 'editor-
> > style.css' related file was not found. This should be addressed with the
> > next update.
> >
> > Overall: not-approved
> > * Items marked => must be addressed, they are singificant and will most
> > likely cause the theme to be not accepted.
> > * Items marked with -> are suggestions, but recommended to be addressed.
> > * Items marked with - are notes and observations.
> > * Other items noted should be addressed and corrected as needed.
> > * Additional review may be required once the above issues are resolved.
> >
> > --
> > Ticket URL: <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/2131#comment:3>
> > WordPress Themes <http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/>
> > WordPress.org Theme Directory Reviews
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101216/75a5c7ca/attachment.htm>