[theme-reviewers] Theme-Check RC

[Edward Caissie]

I just updated to the latest (trunk) version about 20 minutes ago ...

= 20101110.7 =



On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:

> Just an update to this. I've been working on the theme check plugin
> (with Simon's permission) in order to make it "standard" between the
> uploader checking code and the plugin itself. This involved a fair
> amount of rewriting and adjustments. But with these changes, hopefully
> I'll be able to keep the two in sync properly for the future.
>
> The trunk version of the plugin is what I'm working on at the moment,
> so if some people could look and test it out a bit before I move the
> code into wp.org, I'd appreciate it.
> http://plugins.svn.wordpress.org/theme-check/trunk/
>
> Note that it does have some 3.1 checks in there, so it won't be
> "required" to pass until after that release happens and the
> theme-review team says "okay, 3.1 rules apply now".
>
> -Otto
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 1:17 PM, Simon Prosser <pross at pross.org.uk> wrote:
> > As WordPress gets near to a beta release here is the new version of
> theme-check:
> > http://downloads.wordpress.org/plugin/theme-check.20101118.5.zip
> >
> > There are quite a few changes, but mainly the checks are updated to
> > the latest (draft) guidelines
> > and there is now a dropdown to select which theme to check.
> >
> >
> > --
> > My Blog: http://www.pross.org.uk/
> > Plugins : http://www.pross.org.uk/plugins/
> > Themes: http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/profile/pross
> > _______________________________________________
> > theme-reviewers mailing list
> > theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> > http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
> >
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20101201/7803e56b/attachment.htm>