[theme-reviewers] Guidelines regarding Theme Names

[Chip Bennett]

Right on. I threw that together really quickly (and tend to err more toward
a "formal" tone anyway.

Looks good! Some of those (especially the "version-specific, markup-related
terms" item. Could probably use more content there. What else similar don't
we want in Theme names?

Chip

On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:27 AM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:

> I didn't change the intent of the section, but I did go in and
> "lightened-up" the text a bit ... it's a little less "formal" but the
> meaning is the same.
>
>
> Cais.
>
> On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> See here:
>> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review#Theme_Name
>>
>> Please advise, comment, correct, and/or add appropriate Theme Name-related
>> guidelines. I notice I'm running into several instances where I have to
>> comment on the Theme Name. Some objective guidelines in this area will be
>> helpful.
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100830/ae05671f/attachment.htm>