[theme-reviewers] New Tags in 3.0: home_url(), site_url(), admin_url()

[Edward Caissie]

I like this "*Note: this section is currently being drafted. Consider it as
such until this notice is removed.*"

Something like that, or similar in meaning, should be used at all times on
all sections that are being discussed and/or revised, as in add the "under
construction" tape first, then start the edits, etc. ... Safety First!

As to the references: Note: Themes are *strongly recommended* to use
home_url() <http://codex.wordpress.org/Function_Reference/home_url>

I would prefer to go with "Theme authors may also use home_url()" ... at
least until we are given a clear direction from WPORG. Then, if necessary,
we can modify the language to represent their preference.


Cais.

On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:45 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net> wrote:

> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:41 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I'm not seeing a great deal of difference in their functionality from the
>> codex pages.
>>
>> The major differences I am seeing in core are:
>>
>>    - site_url() returns get_option ( 'siteurl' ) vs. home_url returns
>>    get_option( 'home' )
>>    - site_url() does additonal $scheme checks
>>
>> There also appear to be several other "_url" type functions added with
>> 3.0.0.
>>
>> Source:
>> http://core.trac.wordpress.org/browser/tags/3.0.1/wp-includes/link-template.php
>>
>>
>> Cais.
>>
>
> Okay, so I added in a draft section to Theme Review, under Template Tags
> and Hooks. Take a look and let me know if I'm on the right track.
>
> Chip
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100827/185d3a64/attachment.htm>