[theme-reviewers] Requesting reconsideration of Pronto theme forwordpress

[Philip M. Hofer (Frumph)]

http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/815#comment:5

Your theme has been reviewed again Cedric.

- Phil


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Cedric Legras" <pronto at legras.com>
To: <theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org>
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 9:23 AM
Subject: [theme-reviewers] Requesting reconsideration of Pronto theme 
forwordpress


> Hello,
>
> I have submitted my theme and it was rejected because it is too 
> complicated.
> I tend to agree since you need to know css and php.
> However, if you know those languages and like to customize and control 
> your theme, Pronto have some cool featured.
> First the style is separated (see folder styles) so you can quickly change 
> and modified the whole look very quickly (the editor have a nice filter 
> for css) and will check for parsing error for the php file. Actually this 
> folder (styles) is the only one to customize the theme.
> And with this separation, compare to other themes, you know exactly what 
> to change (since there only few KB). If you make a mistake it take 1 click 
> to come back to the previous configuration.
> If you want hooked your own function (add_action in my-functions.php) 
> there is also a nice option for a visual help. Very unique and very 
> efficient. No more guessing where it will be hooked.
> You can also upload files (such as images, or a whole new styles create 
> from your computer)
> The layout is ultra flexible (1-2-3-f), the comments are also nicely 
> 'ajaxed' to save Bandwidth.
> Etc... lot of featured which will be naturally improved in future updated.
>
> I really like to see some reconsideration for Pronto.
>
> Thanks,
> Cedric
>
>
> => The file structure is too different (complicated) for a standard 
> WordPress? theme. Unable to trace the relationships in code between all 
> these files and folders.
>
> / At least this theme needs a good Readme where to be described how it 
> works.
>
> Just for illustration:
> the пьсх index.php contains only this -
>
> <?php
> cjL_body();
> ?>
>
> - Developer needs to thoroughly read the 
> http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review and find all the must-haves and 
> update their theme(s) accordingly, this theme will continue to not pass 
> until all requirements are met.
> - It's useful if the authors check their themes with set WP_DEBUG to 
> 'true' in wp-config.php
>
> Items marked with => are reasons for not being approved
> Items marked with / are just suggestions
>
> This is a tertiary review, enough items didn't pass; Next reviewer might 
> find more so please do everything you can to adhere to the documentation 
> on what is accepted in the theme review.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org 
> [mailto:theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 10:09 PM
> To: pronto at legras.com
> Subject: [WordPress Themes] Pronto, new version 0.72
>
> Thank you for uploading version 0.72 of Pronto.
>
> Feedback will be provided at http://themes.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/815
>
> --
> The WordPress.org Themes Team
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>