[theme-reviewers] Theme Review Codex Page

[Chip Bennett]

That would seem to be easy enough to address: we can leave the page, with a
note that it's deprecated, and a link to the Theme Review page/Theme Unit
Test section.

Chip

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:25 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net
> wrote:

>  Backwards compatible with every link out there that links to it for 1,
> its been around so long its established.
>
> - Phil
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> *From:* Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>
> *To:* Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>
> *Cc:* theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> *Sent:* Friday, August 20, 2010 7:18 PM
> *Subject:* Re: [theme-reviewers] Theme Review Codex Page
>
> On a related note: is there any reason we couldn't - or shouldn't - pull
> the Theme Unit Test Data directly into the Theme Review page? Do we gain
> anything by making developers and reviewers use two separate pages to
> perform one review?
>
> I put a place-holder in, but it merely links to the existing Theme Unit
> Tests page.
>
> What do you think?
>
> Chip
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Chip -
>>
>> Looks like lots of re-working on your part ... well done!
>>
>> There are a few points I want to digest further before commenting on ....
>> maybe mark the page as a work in progress while it is being finalized?
>>
>> Also, after seeing it on the screen  in context, that with an
>> Implementation Date each major version should also have its release date,
>> perhaps beside the version would work.
>>
>>
>> Cais.
>>
>>
>>   On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>>
>>>  Good morning, Theme Reviewers!
>>>
>>> I've taken some time this morning to clean up the Theme Review<http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review>Codex page some more. Hopefully it is more straight-forward, and has a
>>> minimum of duplicate content.
>>>
>>> Please let me know what you think, and fix (or let me know) if I've made
>>> any mistakes, or added any incorrect information.
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Chip
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>>
>>>
>>
>  ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> theme-reviewers mailing list
> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100820/436cf984/attachment.htm>