[theme-reviewers] Theme Review Codex Page

[Chip Bennett]

On a related note: is there any reason we couldn't - or shouldn't - pull the
Theme Unit Test Data directly into the Theme Review page? Do we gain
anything by making developers and reviewers use two separate pages to
perform one review?

I put a place-holder in, but it merely links to the existing Theme Unit
Tests page.

What do you think?

Chip

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:

> Chip -
>
> Looks like lots of re-working on your part ... well done!
>
> There are a few points I want to digest further before commenting on ....
> maybe mark the page as a work in progress while it is being finalized?
>
> Also, after seeing it on the screen  in context, that with an
> Implementation Date each major version should also have its release date,
> perhaps beside the version would work.
>
>
> Cais.
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Chip Bennett <chip at chipbennett.net>wrote:
>
>> Good morning, Theme Reviewers!
>>
>> I've taken some time this morning to clean up the Theme Review<http://codex.wordpress.org/Theme_Review>Codex page some more. Hopefully it is more straight-forward, and has a
>> minimum of duplicate content.
>>
>> Please let me know what you think, and fix (or let me know) if I've made
>> any mistakes, or added any incorrect information.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Chip
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100820/106de45c/attachment.htm>