[theme-reviewers] Theme Review Codex Page
chip at chipbennett.net
Sat Aug 21 01:38:12 UTC 2010
On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:27 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <philip at frumph.net
> Well put it this way ... custom-background is a convience.. that's all,
> just like custom-header.
> While post-thumbnails are a 'feature', if considered as such then I would
> say yeah it should be required, but if I consider it an 'addon' then I would
> say optional.
Just to play Devil's Advocate, let me ask it this way: what would be the
potential *downsides* if Custom Background support were made mandatory?
(Just like I started from the opposite viewpoint, I'm not against returning
to it. We could always use the Tagging system to note which features are
supported by a given Theme.)
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the theme-reviewers