[theme-reviewers] Theme Review Codex Page

[Chip Bennett]

This all got hashed out right when the list and group started getting off
the ground.

I'm open to/fine with revising that conclusion, but at the time the group
decided that it was best for repository-hosted Themes to support all core
features.

Ironically, I originally sided with the school of thought that simple, yet
well-coded Themes should be allowed in the repository - but others'
arguments convinced me that it would be better for repository-hosted Themes
to be "best of the best" with respect to quality, and also, since the
repository is linked from within the WordPress backend, to support all core
features.

As always, I'm open to re-visiting that discussion - but that's where we
ended up back then.

Chip

On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 8:12 PM, Edward Caissie <edward.caissie at gmail.com>wrote:

> As I replied earlier, there are items that I want to digest further ...
> everything under WP2.9 for example.
>
> I see those as optional, nice to be able to include but mandatory, no.
>
>
> Cais.
>
> On Fri, Aug 20, 2010 at 9:04 PM, Philip M. Hofer (Frumph) <
> philip at frumph.net> wrote:
>
>>  So a theme MUST support post-thumbnails ... I would consider that to be
>> an optional..
>>
>> Yes/No? on MUST support.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> theme-reviewers mailing list
>> theme-reviewers at lists.wordpress.org
>> http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.wordpress.org/pipermail/theme-reviewers/attachments/20100820/75fa6192/attachment.htm>