[wp-hackers] HTMLArea Integration

[Elliot Anderson]

Maybe something in XUL for Mozilla browsers?


On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 17:49:29 +0200, Bjorn Wijers <bjorn at waag.org> wrote:
> Another option might be the use of mozilla`s own methods to make pages
> editable, I can`t remember the option or name of it by heart, but I
> guess some on the list would know a bit more about it. There is a
> similar method for IE browser. This would lead to a nice tool for
> Gecko/IE browsers....
> 
> just my 2 eurocents :)
> 
> grtz
> BjornW
> 
> 
> 
> Graeme Lennon wrote:
> 
> > As another alternative, nobody has mentioned Kupu, which my company has
> > used for some internal projects. It's JS-based and claims to work on all
> > major browsers.
> >
> > It can be found here: http://kupu.oscom.org/. There is a very nice demo on
> > that page as well.
> >
> >>From the release notes:
> >
> > What is Kupu?
> > --------------
> >
> > Kupu is a JavaScript WYSIWYG editor that works on both Mozilla and
> > Internet Explorer based browsers. It allows editing a web-page from the
> > application serving it rather then in a seperate application.
> >
> > Key features are extensibility and clean code, but it tries to also
> > provide a good user experience by using a different approach for certain
> > standard things, for instance it's 'document-centric' rather then
> > 'data-centric', meaning that (in the default setup) one edits a full
> > page rather than part of a form (note that it *can* be used as a
> > 'textarea replacement' as well) and it uses PUT request (also optional)
> > whenever possible to give the user the impression he's working in a
> > 'real' application rather then on some web page.
> >
> > Kupu is released under a BSD-style license.
> >
> > g.
> >
> >
> >>There are alternatives.  Both TinyMCE (http://tinymce.moxiecode.com/)
> >>and FCKeditor (http://www.fckeditor.net/) are cross platform, LPGL,
> >>and claim to have XHTML output.  I haven't tried either one.
> >>
> >>On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 10:48:50 -0500, Matthew Mullenweg <m at mullenweg.com>
> >>wrote:
> >>
> >>>Mark Jaquith wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>I think it'd have to be cleaned up a good deal.  The HTML it generates
> >>>>is ugly as sin.
> >>>
> >>>When I've used HTMLArea in the past it's always been with a server-side
> >>>component that cleaned up the incredible amount of crap it generates.
> >>
> >>_______________________________________________
> >>hackers mailing list
> >>hackers at wordpress.org
> >>http://wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/hackers_wordpress.org
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > hackers mailing list
> > hackers at wordpress.org
> > http://wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/hackers_wordpress.org
> >
> 
> --
> Bjorn Wijers
> Interaction Developer
> 
> Waag Society / for old and new media
> Nieuwmarkt 4
> 1012 CR Amsterdam / The Netherlands
> T: +31 20 557 98 98
> F: +31 20 557 98 80
> http://www.waag.org
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> hackers mailing list
> hackers at wordpress.org
> http://wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/hackers_wordpress.org
>