[wp-hackers] function_exists - user woes
Garett Harnish
garett at harnish.ca
Fri Jul 30 22:10:05 UTC 2004
Chris Coggburn wrote:
> Garett Harnish wrote:
>
>> That sounds like a very easy to implement and functional solution.
>> How about something like this:
>>
>> <snip>
>>
>> <?php wp_call_plugin_function('xyz_photos', array('foo' => 'bar', 'x'
>> => '3')); ?>
>
> That looks good to us, but remember people that know nothing about php
> will be completely confused about that. Sure they could just copy and
> paste things...but it makes the user feel a little happier when they
> actually understand what is going on in what they slap in their template.
True. The reason for the array is mostly to reduce the code of
wp_call_plugin_function. The problem is the string "foo=bar:x=3" is a
lot more complicated to do things with. Still, it is doable:
function wp_call_plugin_function ($function, $str_params)
{
// see if function exists
if (function_exists($function))
{
// Break string into key/value pairs
$array_temp = split(":", $str_params);
// Build Associative Array
foreach ($array_temp as $pair)
{
list($key,$value) = split("=", $pair, 2);
$array_params[$key] = $value;
}
// Call function
call_user_func($function, $array_params);
}
}
Then one could call the function like so:
<?php wp_call_plugin_function('xyz_photos','foo=bar:x=3'); ?>
Assuming there isn't a logic flaw in my code, that should do it ... but
it lacks elegance. Still, it should make it easier for an end-user to
understand what they are doing when they plug in the function call.
>> Using a parameter array would definitely make it a lot easier as well.
>
>
> This would, but would confuse the user as said before.
Would the above be better?
--
Garett
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 254 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
Url : /pipermail/hackers_wordpress.org/attachments/20040730/7425a4ff/signature.bin
More information about the hackers
mailing list