[wp-meta] [Making WordPress.org] #1810: Better formatting for FAQ

Making WordPress.org noreply at wordpress.org
Wed Aug 17 04:34:38 UTC 2016


#1810: Better formatting for FAQ
------------------------------+------------------
 Reporter:  samuelsidler      |       Owner:
     Type:  enhancement       |      Status:  new
 Priority:  normal            |   Milestone:
Component:  Plugin Directory  |  Resolution:
 Keywords:                    |
------------------------------+------------------

Comment (by dd32):

 The more correct method to do this would be to parse the FAQ prior to
 markdown occurring, which you can see in the `upgrade_notice` section
 above the proposed change in [attachment:1810.diff], I'm not entirely sure
 why screenshots are being parsed afterwards though..

 You would then expose it as a `Readme\Parser::$faq[ $question ] =>
 $answer` property on the object, `CLI\Parser` would then be responsible
 for storing it however you wanted, which could be a `<dl>` in the post
 content, or as custom meta fields (as we do with screenshots, etc).

 Whichever way you approach it, it's worth remembering that not all FAQ's
 are using `<h4>`'s some use `<h3>` (`members`) and others use `<strong>`
 (`share-this`) or `<h9>` (, some include free form data before the
 headings (for example, `wp-user-avatar`), others (`cookie-notice`) just
 include a paragraph, and then there's those who use free-form "invalid"
 formats (`wpremote` &`jquery-updater`).

 Those plugins were just me opening a bunch of random plugins in the
 database and looking at their post_content, I'd say it was a 50% hit rate
 on "edge cases" while looking for examples. Ignoring, truncating, or
 reformatting plugins like this is fine, we just need to plan that out
 before we parse stuff.

--
Ticket URL: <https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/1810#comment:7>
Making WordPress.org <https://meta.trac.wordpress.org/>
Making WordPress.org


More information about the wp-meta mailing list