[wp-hackers] WordPress Hosting: Individual Sites vs Network

[John 3:16 Media]

interesting seems a little too hacky for my tastes.  And it seems to me it
would create problems of its own.  For example some sites would have a
custom theme avavlible just to them, or that diffrent sites have diffrent
sets of plugins.  Thanks anyway is interesting, although while i read that I
do wonder why the author didn;t just use multisite, lol.

On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 5:08 PM, Stephen Rider <wp-hackers at striderweb.com>wrote:

> Hi --
>
> You might be interested in Virtual Multiblog:
> http://striderweb.com/nerdaphernalia/features/virtual-multiblog/
>
> Stephen Rider
>
> On Mar 6, 2011, at 11:51 PM, John 3:16 Media wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone, I am wanting to get into WordPress hosting
> ...Specifically
> > setting each client up with their own individual site versus using a
> > network.  Having a network does simplify things like provisioning,
> > upgrading, supporting, etc.  Also seems that it could save a large amount
> of
> > disc space, for core wp files, plugins, and themes.
> >
> > But here is my problem with a network: Each site is unique, unrelated,
> > unlike in a blog network (which is what the network feature was designed
> > for), technically I can set it up to keep the sites as independent from
> one
> > another as possible, but they share the same user's table and I would
> really
> > like to avoid this.  Also some clients with advanced needs would still
> have
> > to go on their own individual site.
>
>  _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>