[wp-hackers] Permalink Structure - Performance vs. SEO
banago at gmail.com
Wed Jun 15 08:10:02 UTC 2011
Custom Post Type are the best feature of WP that every developer should ripe
as needed. However, in my case, I will have ONLY proverbs and I got an About
page - that's all. Thanks for the clarification though.
www.wplancer.com | proverbhunter.com | www.banago.info<http://proverbhunter.com>
On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel at newclarity.net
> On Jun 15, 2011, at 3:42 AM, Baki Goxhaj wrote:
> > I've been using CPT since 3.0 beta and I know most of it benefits. What I
> > was interested to know is that it would be better in terms of URL
> > optimisation in my case to use a CPT in stead of Posts PT.
> > I went with the Posts PT becuase I'm not posing anything else than
> > this is absolutely only proverbs and secondly I'm not aware of an
> > of in terms of the URL optimisation you mentioned. Thanks very much for
> > that.
> If the only thing you will *ever* have on your site is proverbs and never
> anything else (no pages, not blog posts, no news, no nothing else), then I
> guess it is no better.
> But it seems rather limiting to choose posts when it is so easy to choose a
> custom post type. Worse is to advocate for use of posts for something better
> done with a CPT on a list where others may see the advice and without your
> pre-meditation choose not to use a custom post type and thus paint
> themselves into a corner.
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
More information about the wp-hackers