otto at ottodestruct.com
Fri Jan 30 22:58:06 GMT 2009
On Fri, Jan 30, 2009 at 3:06 PM, Jacob Santos <wordpress at santosj.name> wrote:
> Lets list the reasons for and against going PHP5:
> 1. Matt Mullenweg be hating PHP5 and he be the God. (Hail Satan!)
> 2. It would leave out 40% of current users (from last posted statistics from
> last year).
> 3. Did I mention Matt Mullenweg not liking PHP5? Okay, good.
> 1. PHP5 is faster than PHP4 (Most benchmarks of PHP 5.2.x show considerable
> improvement, PHP5.3 is so much faster than PHP4, that they didn't even
> attempt to compare it).
> 2. PHP5 has PDO, and mysqli.
> 3. PHP5.3 has namespaces!
> 4. PHP5.3 has closures! No more create_function nonsense, you'll be able to
> actually create a real lambda and closure for usage in
> 5. PHP5 has better object oriented support, re: visibility, true static
> methods and members, class constants.
> 6. PHP5 has OO chaining: $obj->this()->shit()->is()->awesome();
> 7. Actually being worked on actively (PHP4 is EOL early last year and no
> updates for about 8 months now).
> So I mean, supporting PHP4 only really has one reason for going for it and
> PHP5 has many reason!
> Jacob Santos
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
I like PHP 5. I only use PHP 5. But I gotta agree with Matt here.
Setting a site up for use of PHP 5 on many hosts is a) not the default
and b) not obvious.
It's too soon. Wait for PHP5 to be ubiquitous. I suspect that'll be
less than a year from now.
That said, we should start supporting more PHP5-only features in WP.
Stuff that doesn't show up if your PHP version doesn't support it,
sort of thing. I cannot say what these will be, but if you see a
enhancement ticket solved by use of PHP5-only functionality, then it
should be considered more instead of rejected out of hand.
More information about the wp-hackers