[wp-hackers] Less than Core, More than Plugins/Themes:
Proposing Optional Modules.
mikeschinkel at newclarity.net
Tue Feb 3 01:14:23 GMT 2009
----- Original Message -----
From: "Dan Gayle" <dangayle at gmail.com>
To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
Sent: Monday, February 2, 2009 7:46:03 PM GMT -05:00 US/Canada Eastern
Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] Less than Core, More than Plugins/Themes: Proposing Optional Modules.
On Feb 2, 2009, at 4:36 PM, Matt Walters wrote:
> I'm not saying that the Module idea is not worth it (I'm more or less
> indifferent). But I do think modules could potentially compound this
> concern. I get what you're saying in that even currently, a theme may
> not work without x, y and z plugins, but adding in Modules would only
> expand the risk of running into those issues.
Wouldn't having a standardized set of modules available just transfer
the requirements of dependencies, if not lessen them? If a theme
requires plugin X, Y, and Z, but module A provides most of the
functionality in a standardized environment, I see that as a good
thing. Any additional theme specific functions could go into
functions.php where they belong.
wp-hackers mailing list
wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
More information about the wp-hackers