[wp-hackers] We already know you are awesome, you don't have to prove it

[Jeremy Visser]

On Sun, 2008-01-06 at 00:40 -0600, Jacob Santos wrote: 
> Peer reviews would be good for already existing code, well for any code. 
> I do think that peer reviews are more for obvious bug issues and "WTF?" 
> moments.

Code is kinda already peer reviewed, isn't it? I mean, in Trac, when you
submit a patch, there's usually a "+1" or "-1", which is kind of the
same thing, isn't it?