mistahp.hackers at gmail.com
Fri Apr 4 15:45:25 GMT 2008
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:47 AM, Otto <otto at ottodestruct.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 8:26 AM, Mistah P <mistahp.hackers at gmail.com> wrote:
> > That is a handy function. I'd like to see that in core, provided it's
> > made a little more flexible (like returning true if there's any tag
> > when nothing is passed to the function, and maybe checking tags by id
> > or slug).
> First stab at that, tell me if I missed anything:
That's nice work, Otto. It does exactly what I'd expect.
I can see one potential issue though, and this may be splitting hairs.
Should there be a way to distinguish a numeric tag slug from a tag id?
Examples: the number 666 might be a tag people use in discussions of
occultism and the number 42 might be a tag used by Douglas Adams fans.
Should there be a way to identify the type of identifier the function
should be looking for? I'm not advocating that, as it would probably
be pretty uncommon, but it may be worth discussing.
More information about the wp-hackers