[wp-hackers] Atom Publishing Protocol work - Ticket 4191

Matt Patenaude MattPat at mattpat.net
Fri May 25 00:13:17 GMT 2007


OK, time for the n00bish question :P

Atom Publishing Protocol vs. Atom API-- same thing, different things,  
AtomPP = latest edition of Atom API?

Thanks!

-Matt

On May 24, 2007, at 8:01 PM, Elias Torres wrote:

> Thanks for the pointers. I'll definitely look at it in case there's
> anything I can use.
>
> -Elias
>
> On 5/24/07, Kevin Newman <CaptainN at unfocus.com> wrote:
>> Hi Elias,
>>
>> I wrote a validating atom mod a while back for WordPress 2.1.x (I
>> recently updated it for 2.2).
>>
>> If there is anything useful in it, please feel to use it:
>> http://www.adcstudio.com/blog/wp-includes/feed-atom.php.txt
>>
>> The validating feed:
>> http://www.adcstudio.com/blog/feed/atom/
>> http://feedvalidator.org/check.cgi?url=http%3A%2F% 
>> 2Fwww.adcstudio.com%2Fblog%2Ffeed%2Fatom%2F
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Kevin N.
>>
>>
>> Elias Torres wrote:
>> > Hi hackers,
>> >
>> > I might have introduced myself before, but I'll do it quickly  
>> again. I
>> > work at IBM for an innovations team in the CIO office (bleech),  
>> anyways,
>> > I like to work in open source and standards. I use WordPress  
>> personally
>> > and also participate in the Atom APP workging group at the IETF.  
>> I have
>> > been working on the WordPress AtomPP implementation for sometime  
>> now and
>> > that's what we have included in WordPress 2.2. Before today, the
>> > workflow was that I'd submit a patch and wait for Dougal to verify
>> > before it was committed. The turn around time and other things  
>> make this
>> >  really hard to make progress and leads to very large patches.
>> >
>> > After chatting with Matt, he suggested I write to the list for  
>> everyone
>> > to be involved in the review process as well as me sending  
>> smaller (more
>> > understandable) patches. I had a huge patch that did some  
>> unconventional
>> > conversion from tabs to spaces making it very unreadable. I  
>> fixed it,
>> > but it's still a bit larger then usual. I would like people to  
>> review it
>> > and suggest we commit it. From now, I'll stay more closely  
>> aligned with
>> > the releases and make sure we have a robust APP implementation  
>> as the WG
>> > is hopefully???? near completion. We are I'd say 75% there and I'm
>> > willing to put in the time, but I need to know the commitment of  
>> the
>> > group to quickly review small patches and commit without  
>> depending on a
>> > single third-person to review.
>> >
>> > Behold the patch -> http://trac.wordpress.org/ticket/4191
>> >
>> > Looking forward to working with the community here at large.
>> >
>> > -Elias
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > wp-hackers mailing list
>> > wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> > http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>> >
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> wp-hackers mailing list
>> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
>> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers
>>
> _______________________________________________
> wp-hackers mailing list
> wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
> http://lists.automattic.com/mailman/listinfo/wp-hackers



More information about the wp-hackers mailing list