[wp-hackers] Re: Preferred method of fetching remote webpage?
davebytes at comcast.net
Thu Jun 22 18:12:21 GMT 2006
Rob Miller wrote:
| David Chait wrote:
| > No, it's obvious he just strips the headers.
| > I too wrote my own retrieval library -- underlying CG-FeedRead and
| > (and upcoming projects...) -- targeting quick XML fetches. And yes, I
| > with the various redirect and other header codes. After using built-in
| > stuff for a while, that then broke on some hosts, then trying one or two
| > libraries, which didn't always work, I wrote my own -- just easier at
| > point. ;)
| > If you're only concerned with WP, definitely use WP facilities. I've
| > written general-purpose solutions, thus didn't want to 'rely' on a given
| > platform's includes. :)
| > -d
| But Snoopy is standalone, incredibly stable, flexible and supports
| anything you throw at it, plus it's included with WP... why reinvent the
| wheel with something that's likely to be inferior?
First, what didn't you understand of my comment "If you're only concerned
with WP, definitely use WP facilities."? ;)
Second, much of what I was up against 2 years ago (or more!) when I laid the
groundwork was not understanding the actual exchange -- so coding it myself
just made sense. Would I switch to another library at some point? Maybe.
But I like mine, I know the ins and outs, etc. If I was starting from
scratch today, would I use Snoopy (or other libs)? Probably. But, today is
not 2 years ago... ;)
More information about the wp-hackers