[wp-hackers] anyone looked at Chameleon closely?
Brian at TheCodeCave.com
Tue Jun 6 20:35:46 GMT 2006
How it is distributed, does not really matter.
Assuming Matt's team of lawyers don't disagree. ;) That section means that
unless the plug-ins contain code originally contained in WordPress, they
don't have to be GPL.
IMHO, licensing is up to the individual plug-in author UNLESS the plug-in
includes a WP unit. If the plug-in pulls in ANY WP code, /then/ it in part
contains a GPL licensed product and therefore must be GPL'd.
Knowledge = Power = Energy = Matter = Mass
(Infinite Mass = A Black Hole)
A good book is just a genteel Black Hole that knows how to read.
Terry Pratchet - Guards! Guards! - Page 6 Footnote
From: wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com
[mailto:wp-hackers-bounces at lists.automattic.com] On Behalf Of Aaron Brazell
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 4:25 PM
To: wp-hackers at lists.automattic.com
Subject: Re: [wp-hackers] anyone looked at Chameleon closely?
On 6/6/06, Trevor Turk <trevorturk at gmail.com> wrote:
> Good point. I'm pretty sure that Plugins come with licenses and copyrights
> of their own - which almost certainly require attribution.
Hmm. Not so sure. Sec 2(b) suggests that plugins too, if distributed as part
of the product, would be under GPL:
b) You must cause any work that you distribute or publish, that in
whole or in part contains or is derived from the Program or any
part thereof, to be licensed as a whole at no charge to all third
parties under the terms of this License.
More information about the wp-hackers