[wp-hackers] 2.next - faster [flat/static build]

Douglas Daulton apakuni at gmail.com
Mon Feb 6 23:25:36 GMT 2006

Agreed.  However isn't there an SEO gain from parsing the static page
itself?  Happy to be educated to the contrary.

On 2/6/06 2:31 PM, "Matt Mullenweg" <m at mullenweg.com> wrote:

> Douglas Daulton wrote:
>> In addition to tweaking SQL, creating a native option for a flat/static
>> build (like Moveable Type) would reduce server load and increase SEO for WP
>> 2.next.  There are some plug-ins out there that do this.  Why not look at
>> them all and build a "best of show" into the core.
> Just to dispel a common misperception, there is NO SEO benefit by having
> static files as opposed to WP's nice permalinks. They both look "static"
> to search engines.

More information about the wp-hackers mailing list