[wp-hackers] Forum Help
mpt at myrealbox.com
Sun May 15 11:01:16 GMT 2005
Mike Little wrote:
> without wanting to get into a full blown discussion going over old old
> ground on this subject, you need to understand that the wording of
> IETF RFCs is very specific about 'must' and 'should', etc. Regardless
> of how anyone else might interpret these words in any other context.
> RFC 2119 has the full details: http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2119.html
Sure, but come on -- do you really think the reason WordPress doesn't
follow this part of the RFC is because, when implementing those pages,
Matt read RFC 2616 and said "oh, it only says SHOULD, we're all right
then"? :-) Many authors (including me) just didn't read it.
> So, WordPress, along with millions of other web applications (think
> web counters),
Web counters have always been broken anyway (think caches).
> has GET requests which change the state of the server.
And have always been broken. Google Web Accelerator is merely the most
famous of many pre-fetching accelerators, some of which have been around
for years. Are you going to try and block them all?
And it's not just accelerators you have to worry about. Imagine that
you're not using comment moderation (maybe you're using an anti-spam
plug-in instead). Then one day someone makes a seemingly innocent
comment on one of your posts, linking to an article they found on a
similar subject. You click the link, and by the time you realize it goes
it's too late.
More information about the wp-hackers