<HTML><HEAD></HEAD>
<BODY dir=ltr>
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV style="FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: 12pt">
<DIV>.. you missed the point entirely there Otto, has nothing to do with
revision numbers; it has to do with not having all of your old users get their
sites destroyed by an update and keeping the same name but it’s a new release of
the same theme but with the addition of II at the end of it to keep it denoted
as the responsive theme but next generation</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>They could write the name Responsive NG and it wouldn’t make a difference
the current rule says they can’t use responsive again. the II was just
written as a matter of descriptor towards the current state.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none">
<DIV style="FONT: 10pt tahoma">
<DIV><FONT size=3 face=Calibri></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV style="BACKGROUND: #f5f5f5">
<DIV style="font-color: black"><B>From:</B> <A title=otto@ottodestruct.com
href="mailto:otto@ottodestruct.com">Otto</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Sent:</B> Friday, September 26, 2014 1:23 PM</DIV>
<DIV><B>To:</B> <A title=theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org
href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org">Discussion list for WordPress
theme reviewers.</A> </DIV>
<DIV><B>Subject:</B> Re: [theme-reviewers] Why can't theme authors have a second
version of a theme?</DIV></DIV></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV
style="FONT-STYLE: normal; DISPLAY: inline; FONT-FAMILY: 'Calibri'; COLOR: #000000; FONT-SIZE: small; FONT-WEIGHT: normal; TEXT-DECORATION: none">
<DIV dir=ltr>
<DIV class=gmail_extra>
<DIV>On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 2:44 PM, Trent Lapinski <SPAN dir=ltr><<A
href="mailto:trent@cyberchimps.com"
target=_blank>trent@cyberchimps.com</A>></SPAN> wrote:<BR></DIV>
<DIV class=gmail_quote>
<BLOCKQUOTE
style="BORDER-LEFT: rgb(204,204,204) 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex"
class=gmail_quote>
<DIV style="WORD-WRAP: break-word">
<DIV>We are trying to release Responsive 2.0, and after a year of development
and months of debating how to release it we’re now being told we cannot have
two themes with the same name.</DIV>
<DIV></DIV></DIV></BLOCKQUOTE></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=gmail_extra>So, you want to have "responsive two version zero point
zero point one" and you don't see an inherent problem with this?<BR></DIV>
<DIV class=gmail_extra>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>Version numbers are version numbers. Making your next theme named the same
but with an extra fake version number in it is plain ridiculous.<BR></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>You're the one risking brand confusion here. "Which version of Responsive
are you using?" "Oh, version 2". "There is no version two, Responsive only goes
to version one nine seven three." <BR></DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV>
<DIV>My vote: If it's a new theme, then it should have a new name. If it's not a
new theme, then it shouldn't have a separate entry in the theme directory for
it.</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV>
<DIV class=gmail_extra>
<DIV>-Otto</DIV>
<DIV> </DIV>
<DIV> </DIV></DIV></DIV></DIV>
<P>
<HR>
_______________________________________________<BR>theme-reviewers mailing
list<BR>theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org<BR>http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers<BR></DIV></DIV></DIV></BODY></HTML>