<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    Got it.  Thanks for clarifying.<br>
    <br>
    <div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 11/20/2013 6:35 PM, Chip Bennett
      wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote
cite="mid:CAPdLKqd1d6rO5S3dSqi0AE-Gh-iTag5eU20PTdXQCiKu0m_Zuw@mail.gmail.com"
      type="cite">
      <div dir="ltr">Yep, I would agree that a link from the Theme
        Options page is good. A banner on Theme activation is not.</div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Emil
          Uzelac <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
              href="mailto:emil@uzelac.me" target="_blank">emil@uzelac.me</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
            .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
            <div dir="ltr">I am thinking the manner in which it was done
              and personally don't see
              <div>the problem of having that extra link from Theme
                Options :) It leads to</div>
              <div>WPORG anyways.</div>
            </div>
            <div class="HOEnZb">
              <div class="h5">
                <div class="gmail_extra">
                  <br>
                  <br>
                  <div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Nov 20, 2013 at 6:29
                    PM, Justin Tadlock <span dir="ltr"><<a
                        moz-do-not-send="true"
                        href="mailto:justin@justintadlock.com"
                        target="_blank">justin@justintadlock.com</a>></span>
                    wrote:<br>
                    <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0
                      .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                      <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000"> After the
                        theme promotion discussion, I got the impression
                        that we were after far worse things than giving
                        the user a link back to review the theme on
                        WordPress.org. <br>
                        <br>
                        Is it the manner in which it was done or is it
                        simply that the link itself shouldn't be
                        allowed? <br>
                        <br>
                        Just trying to get everyone on the same page
                        here since this has already been opened up here
                        for discussion in the mailing list.<br>
                      </div>
                    </blockquote>
                  </div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
          </blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>