<div dir="ltr">"mobile-friendly" is good, no doubt about that, however that is not<div style>what people are searching for. </div><div style><br></div><div style>If we take Google keyword tool for example we'll see that folks are </div>
<div style>not looking for these keywords.</div><div style><br></div><div style>"mobile ready design" returns 0 searches, while "responsive web design"<br></div><div style>shows about 200K monthly.</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>Not to disagree over the word "responsive" and I leave this entirely up to Otto,</div><div style>however Amy does have a solid point, "responsive" is no longer a fad, it's a technique.</div>
<div style><br></div><div style>And it doesn't matter what we think about the word, "responsive" is</div><div style>here to stay and it will grow even more this year.</div><div style><br></div><div style>Take a look at this link please:</div>
<div style><a href="http://blog.lib.uiowa.edu/hardinmd/2012/05/03/responsive-design-sites-higher-ed-libraries-notables/">http://blog.lib.uiowa.edu/hardinmd/2012/05/03/responsive-design-sites-higher-ed-libraries-notables/</a><br>
</div><div style><br></div><div style>My experience is completely opposite from Justin's and I can count on a single</div><div style>hand how many clients asked me to build a "mobile-*" design. </div><div style>
<br></div><div style>Each month I design at least couple of sites and setup between 5-8.</div><div style><br></div><div style>Here's another <a href="http://wordpress.org/extend/themes/responsive/stats/">proof</a>: tomorrow reaching half a million downloads 13% comes from</div>
<div style>WPORG and the rest is from the search engines ;) </div><div style><br></div><div style>Now you be the judge what's really going on.</div><div style><br></div><div style>My 2¢</div><div style><br></div><div style>
<br></div><div style><br></div><div style><br></div><div style><br></div><div style><br></div><div style><br></div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 10:06 PM, Justin Tadlock <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:justin@justintadlock.com" target="_blank">justin@justintadlock.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I'm on board with a "mobile-friendly" or similarly-named tag but not "responsive". I've set up probably 50+ sites for regular people over the past year. Not a single one of those people knew what responsive meant. Nearly all of them knew what mobile friendly/ready meant.<br>
<br>
Also, +1 to possibly overhauling the current tag system and adding more user-oriented tags.<br>
<br>
On 2/25/2013 8:21 PM, Daniel Fenn wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Otto has a good point about the word responsive, it would be better if<br>
it was mobile-friendly or something like that.<br>
<br>
Also while we are at it, can we add tags where themes are designed to<br>
intergrate with different systems, for example my propress theme where<br>
one can use it to have their forum look on their blog as well. (I know<br>
it old but I am updating it and I think it almost ready to have the<br>
reviewers pick at it.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Merci Javier <<a href="mailto:mercijavier@gmail.com" target="_blank">mercijavier@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 4:31 PM, Amy Hendrix <<a href="mailto:sabreuse@gmail.com" target="_blank">sabreuse@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
The whole point of the tag filter is to allow end-users to find things<br>
more easily. Whether you think it's a buzzword or not, "Responsive" has come<br>
to be *very* widely used in the web design world over the course of several<br>
years. "Adaptive" has not.<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
What Amy said.<br>
<br>
+1 on adding "responsive" tag.<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org" target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.<u></u>wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/theme-<u></u>reviewers</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org" target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.<u></u>wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/theme-<u></u>reviewers</a><br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
theme-reviewers mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:theme-reviewers@lists.wordpress.org" target="_blank">theme-reviewers@lists.<u></u>wordpress.org</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.wordpress.org/mailman/listinfo/theme-reviewers" target="_blank">http://lists.wordpress.org/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/theme-<u></u>reviewers</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div>